<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social engineering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stillbreathing.co.uk/blog/2008/02/21/social-engineering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stillbreathing.co.uk/blog/2008/02/21/social-engineering/</link>
	<description>where the web, Wordpress, jazz and beer collide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 05:02:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Web capital = social capital - stillbreathing.co.uk - website design and development</title>
		<link>http://www.stillbreathing.co.uk/blog/2008/02/21/social-engineering/comment-page-1/#comment-16059</link>
		<dc:creator>Web capital = social capital - stillbreathing.co.uk - website design and development</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 21:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stillbreathing.co.uk/blog/2008/02/21/social-engineering/#comment-16059</guid>
		<description>[...] Except it&#8217;s all bullshiitake (to borrow a phrase from Guy). For more information on that see my recent post about social engineering. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Except it&#8217;s all bullshiitake (to borrow a phrase from Guy). For more information on that see my recent post about social engineering. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.stillbreathing.co.uk/blog/2008/02/21/social-engineering/comment-page-1/#comment-14267</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 02:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stillbreathing.co.uk/blog/2008/02/21/social-engineering/#comment-14267</guid>
		<description>You are write about &quot;aquaintance&quot; Chris; I used it once or twice and people gave me a look to say, &quot;Have you dropped in from the 17th century?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are write about &#8220;aquaintance&#8221; Chris; I used it once or twice and people gave me a look to say, &#8220;Have you dropped in from the 17th century?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arctic Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.stillbreathing.co.uk/blog/2008/02/21/social-engineering/comment-page-1/#comment-14255</link>
		<dc:creator>Arctic Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stillbreathing.co.uk/blog/2008/02/21/social-engineering/#comment-14255</guid>
		<description>I think there already is a word, or at least a term for this type of contact.....

Solicited Spam!!

http://www.howies.co.uk/product.php/1154/0/

FoX</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there already is a word, or at least a term for this type of contact&#8230;..</p>
<p>Solicited Spam!!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.howies.co.uk/product.php/1154/0/" rel="nofollow">http://www.howies.co.uk/product.php/1154/0/</a></p>
<p>FoX</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.stillbreathing.co.uk/blog/2008/02/21/social-engineering/comment-page-1/#comment-14244</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stillbreathing.co.uk/blog/2008/02/21/social-engineering/#comment-14244</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s probably a wise outlook. In the past I&#039;ve been a lot more liberal with my use of the word, possibly because there aren&#039;t many alternatives in English. For example, &quot;acquaintance&quot; sounds too posh and informal.

Maybe we need a new word inventing to describe this new type of networked contact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s probably a wise outlook. In the past I&#8217;ve been a lot more liberal with my use of the word, possibly because there aren&#8217;t many alternatives in English. For example, &#8220;acquaintance&#8221; sounds too posh and informal.</p>
<p>Maybe we need a new word inventing to describe this new type of networked contact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.stillbreathing.co.uk/blog/2008/02/21/social-engineering/comment-page-1/#comment-14228</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 05:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stillbreathing.co.uk/blog/2008/02/21/social-engineering/#comment-14228</guid>
		<description>Very good post.  Though I also use a particular social-networking site.

I tend to use the word &#039;friend&#039; very restrictively, for I believe it means similar to what you have written above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good post.  Though I also use a particular social-networking site.</p>
<p>I tend to use the word &#8216;friend&#8217; very restrictively, for I believe it means similar to what you have written above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
