<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HTML is still where it&#8217;s at</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stillbreathing.co.uk/blog/2008/04/21/html-is-still-where-its-at/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stillbreathing.co.uk/blog/2008/04/21/html-is-still-where-its-at/</link>
	<description>where the web, Wordpress, jazz and beer collide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 05:02:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.stillbreathing.co.uk/blog/2008/04/21/html-is-still-where-its-at/comment-page-1/#comment-17377</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 19:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stillbreathing.co.uk/blog/?p=641#comment-17377</guid>
		<description>I think you or the article is probably misinterpreting what they mean.

In effect they are saying that they can see no place for staff which only have HTML skills.  In this day and age, they are outdated and almost defunct if they have not kept up with the latest technologies.

Nobody is saying it is dead, but it has moved on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you or the article is probably misinterpreting what they mean.</p>
<p>In effect they are saying that they can see no place for staff which only have HTML skills.  In this day and age, they are outdated and almost defunct if they have not kept up with the latest technologies.</p>
<p>Nobody is saying it is dead, but it has moved on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
